>>509182236
Of course.
There is 'Q'
There are 'Anons'
There is no 'Qanon'
Not Anonymous but Twitter.
[owned and operated]
A creation to combat 'Q'
Imagine that.
Why expend so much time and money discrediting, defaming, and (in some instances), straight up sabotaging some nobody who started on 4chan?
Was it jealousy because of the initial attention given by the Trump administration?
Or
Was it methodically sabotaged by egotistical maniacs who couldn't stop playing with a "toy" that wasn't theirs?
Do you remember Sid from toy story?
>news flash
The bullies didn't get any smarter,
&
Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming