Search Results
7/10/2025, 12:59:50 PM
>>509995345
Good post Anon.
Sme anons forget how Trump's major successes thrive on feedback. Populism gauges public opinion and adjusts accordingly. By floating ideas like amnesty for alien farmers, he opened the floodgates for criticism from his base, ultimately settling the topic with "it's not happening".
With Epstein, I understand the frustration. For months now, Trump keeps being hit with questions from journalists that frankly have nothing to do with the main subject matter of his press conferences. There is time to address Epstein, but dealing with the Texas floods is time-sensitive you know?
We also have to keep in mind that the FBI undoubtedly cleaned house before Patel and Bongino entered the premises. They're working inside a web of lies, with barely any cooperation from the CIA which mostly exists as an independent 4th branch of government. Any evidence related to the people in power who associated with Epstein was likely the first to go, alongside the man's body in that jail cell, all those years ago.
So why won't Kash address this? Why not call out the intelligence services? Because his primary goal as FBI dir. is to uproot the old system and restore faith in the intelligence agencies, to stop spying on your average Americans and ensure people can believe in the FBI again. If he says it's not possible, that dark forces are threatening his life, and that evidence has been wiped, it will have the opposite effect at a time when absence of proof of absence.
In better news, former FBI director Comey and former CIA director Brennan are under investigation for their collusion against Trump in past years, which is definitely a more pressing issue. They've both been stripped of their security clearance (which is Washington's prime currency) and hopefully will face severe repercussions. Tucker Carlson recently spoke with a former CIA whistleblower who was persecuted by Brennan so I can see the urgency.
https://youtu.be/YCCQzXmSk8w?si=z7ybkWwfipAEScil
Good post Anon.
Sme anons forget how Trump's major successes thrive on feedback. Populism gauges public opinion and adjusts accordingly. By floating ideas like amnesty for alien farmers, he opened the floodgates for criticism from his base, ultimately settling the topic with "it's not happening".
With Epstein, I understand the frustration. For months now, Trump keeps being hit with questions from journalists that frankly have nothing to do with the main subject matter of his press conferences. There is time to address Epstein, but dealing with the Texas floods is time-sensitive you know?
We also have to keep in mind that the FBI undoubtedly cleaned house before Patel and Bongino entered the premises. They're working inside a web of lies, with barely any cooperation from the CIA which mostly exists as an independent 4th branch of government. Any evidence related to the people in power who associated with Epstein was likely the first to go, alongside the man's body in that jail cell, all those years ago.
So why won't Kash address this? Why not call out the intelligence services? Because his primary goal as FBI dir. is to uproot the old system and restore faith in the intelligence agencies, to stop spying on your average Americans and ensure people can believe in the FBI again. If he says it's not possible, that dark forces are threatening his life, and that evidence has been wiped, it will have the opposite effect at a time when absence of proof of absence.
In better news, former FBI director Comey and former CIA director Brennan are under investigation for their collusion against Trump in past years, which is definitely a more pressing issue. They've both been stripped of their security clearance (which is Washington's prime currency) and hopefully will face severe repercussions. Tucker Carlson recently spoke with a former CIA whistleblower who was persecuted by Brennan so I can see the urgency.
https://youtu.be/YCCQzXmSk8w?si=z7ybkWwfipAEScil
Page 1