>>105918183
>>105919710
Seems like there's a lot of whining about display-sync here... Why not just use madVR? madVR is currently the only video renderer with competent display synchronization.

Here's how you enable it...
rendering > general settings > present a frame for every vsync

Yes! It's that simple. Just remember to set a reasonable backbuffer queue depending on your hardware, and you're good to go.

Here's how you're better than the average mpvtard if you switch to madVR.

>madVR's vsync does not rely on jittery API timings, and is aware of your current vblank frequency to give you the best presentation possible
"B-But muh display-resamp--"
Not so fast, mpvtard.
>madVR's vsync does not speed up or slow down your video files, ruining the creator's intended vision
>madVR's vsync does not resample the audio, meaning that you will avoid random audio distortions and preserve bit-exact passthrough
>madVR's vsync does not allow the A/V clock deviation to exceed humanly noticeable thresholds
>madVR's vsync will calculate the rate of repeat frames, and will log if there's a presentation glitch.

Why use an inferior piece of software? Every film enthusiast deserves excellence because every pixel counts and every frame counts. And excellence is only achievable through madVR.