Search Results

Found 1 results for "778389b0527f8e08624f6cb5005dbe64" across all boards searching md5.

Anonymous /tg/95849839#96020401
7/5/2025, 10:50:05 PM
>>96020213
If they're furry, there's no reason for undergarments, or possibly even clothes as a whole.
If they're only furred on their tails and ears, I think a cutout would make the most sense. Basically a V or U shaped hole in the cloth. The belt would just go over the tail. Underwear is no problem, it's not that high. There would be no lowriding pants though, people would have to actually wear their pants at their waists, not their hips. Sweats and pajamas would probably just be worn below the tail, and fully unacceptable in public rather than merely frowned upon (assuming similar sexual standards). Longer loose shirts can help cover the area too, or anything people wear to conceal a firearm.
I quickly drew the lowest pants I think you could manage. But I'd imagine a much deeper cut to be standard (green dotted line). With this you could add a flap to cover the exposed skin after the pants are put on.
Also, skirts and dresses are going to be much more attractive for women. The largely fell out of favor IRL because of the massive increase in average weight (fat thighs=chafing), so if this hasn't happened just letting the tail be in the skirts is probably fine.