Search Results
6/26/2025, 2:45:31 PM
>>508781030
historicism for the win bruh, if it happens it means it's superior, can't go wrong by going with the flow
historicism for the win bruh, if it happens it means it's superior, can't go wrong by going with the flow
ID: /2RyoPOt/pol/508464375#508472516
6/23/2025, 6:34:41 PM
>>508472021
Nice try twisting grammar to dodge the point. Sure, “God exalted him” is past tense—but the submission of every knee in verse 10 is still something to happen—it says “should bow,” not “have bowed.” If Christ’s kingship were fully realized now, why would the text call for universal acknowledgment as a future event? You’re desperate to read it as a present fact because the world clearly doesn’t reflect that reality. Adding “eventually” isn’t my invention—it’s how language and context work. Stop pretending your cherry-picked verse overturns the obvious gap between the claim and the lived world.
Nice try twisting grammar to dodge the point. Sure, “God exalted him” is past tense—but the submission of every knee in verse 10 is still something to happen—it says “should bow,” not “have bowed.” If Christ’s kingship were fully realized now, why would the text call for universal acknowledgment as a future event? You’re desperate to read it as a present fact because the world clearly doesn’t reflect that reality. Adding “eventually” isn’t my invention—it’s how language and context work. Stop pretending your cherry-picked verse overturns the obvious gap between the claim and the lived world.
6/23/2025, 6:34:41 PM
>>22857214
Nice try twisting grammar to dodge the point. Sure, “God exalted him” is past tense—but the submission of every knee in verse 10 is still something to happen—it says “should bow,” not “have bowed.” If Christ’s kingship were fully realized now, why would the text call for universal acknowledgment as a future event? You’re desperate to read it as a present fact because the world clearly doesn’t reflect that reality. Adding “eventually” isn’t my invention—it’s how language and context work. Stop pretending your cherry-picked verse overturns the obvious gap between the claim and the lived world.
Nice try twisting grammar to dodge the point. Sure, “God exalted him” is past tense—but the submission of every knee in verse 10 is still something to happen—it says “should bow,” not “have bowed.” If Christ’s kingship were fully realized now, why would the text call for universal acknowledgment as a future event? You’re desperate to read it as a present fact because the world clearly doesn’t reflect that reality. Adding “eventually” isn’t my invention—it’s how language and context work. Stop pretending your cherry-picked verse overturns the obvious gap between the claim and the lived world.
Page 1