Search Results
7/12/2025, 7:33:06 AM
>>63972343
>they could defeat the weak spots in the T-64's armor all the same.
And real life isn't your War Thunder game where you get to leisurely aim at weak areas with perfect visual clarity and optimal, modern FCS.
>it wasn't designed againt APFSDS at all.
Yet it was superbly protected against 105mm guns until 1984.
>Even 105mm APDS had 25% chance of defeating a T-64 frontally at 1km per soviet calculations
A 25% chance of being defeated when you defeat your enemies tanks with +90% likelihood on any impact is not a good equation for the NATO troops going up against these. It's suicide.
>it was a tank with superior armor, that's true. nothing more.
A better gun, more accurate than contemporary NATO ones, so forth. NATO equivalents had NOTHING going for them.
>the only thing soviet doctrine would do is get them slaughtered en masse
And that is what they planned for. Casualties do not matter, only achieving the objective. The next echelon will advance over their bodies and keep rolling forward, further and further West. Any rapid forces (tanks) the NATO troops could throw at them, would again not be able to stop them, because they can't even penetrate them frontally.
>they could defeat the weak spots in the T-64's armor all the same.
And real life isn't your War Thunder game where you get to leisurely aim at weak areas with perfect visual clarity and optimal, modern FCS.
>it wasn't designed againt APFSDS at all.
Yet it was superbly protected against 105mm guns until 1984.
>Even 105mm APDS had 25% chance of defeating a T-64 frontally at 1km per soviet calculations
A 25% chance of being defeated when you defeat your enemies tanks with +90% likelihood on any impact is not a good equation for the NATO troops going up against these. It's suicide.
>it was a tank with superior armor, that's true. nothing more.
A better gun, more accurate than contemporary NATO ones, so forth. NATO equivalents had NOTHING going for them.
>the only thing soviet doctrine would do is get them slaughtered en masse
And that is what they planned for. Casualties do not matter, only achieving the objective. The next echelon will advance over their bodies and keep rolling forward, further and further West. Any rapid forces (tanks) the NATO troops could throw at them, would again not be able to stop them, because they can't even penetrate them frontally.
Page 1