>>102644096
Because despite all the ancap bullshit you hear online currency will never be free

Unregulated currency is too volatile (bitcoin inflated from purchasing power of $1 USD to $10,000 USD in less than a decade) so any serious organization will want something backed by a regulating body

In theory however, what you're basically saying is that you want to hide the transactions for money which is money laundering lmao

It would be blacklisted by any country that cares about taxes (pretty much all of them) and if it did work would likely get torn down the second someone uses it to transact money for CP

>>102373581
fergalicious

>>102133848
Your words are powerless beyond initiating my taunts ehe :3

@meat