>>82088605
Apparently what happened here is you thought I was being bitchy instead of playful, and henceforth decided to bitch the first bitch thinking it in justified self-defense. Understandable, albeit mistaken. I mean, you're allowed to take offense to my reply regardless of whether it was objectively bitchy in tone or intent. But that is indeed on you.

Just because you felt attacked doesn't mean that's not standard reply format.
>Topic
>"I have this experience and perspective!"
>"I am going to counter or expand upon that (in addition to the post I already made about nipple stimulation induced orgasms) for the sake of everyone's knowledge-gathering about what is or is not possible, standard, or preferred by femanons, because you're uninformed/unexperienced!"

You could have continued the discussion instead of utterly crumbling and snapping on another Anon moments later because... You identify too strongly with the idea that it's impossible, and being wrong is infuriating because you see yourself as some sort of AMA-machine whose only worth is providing instant (You)s to horny/curious robots as your main source of socializing/validation/male attention, so to be corrected or challenged is to be humiliated or made less valuable (which you can't afford since you're a 2/10 sperg already)? Not sure.
Anyhow. That's all that cleared up. Try to be less stupid and offputting next time.