>>60744907
>globalism never been more relevant and dominant than it is today

Are you sure about this? The executive branch has stacies and pretty low tier intellect boomers compared to the past. Companies to me seem to be run by computers with hands off CEOs giving daily management power to women. I don't see any "dominant" institutes backing globalism anymore. Where are the high energy focused men to drive globalism? You could say big tech but are guys like elon musk authentic leaders? I would argue the old stock fell off after 2008 and bush jr years was last moment companies on the stock market felt like they had real growth and you were buying into real assets.