>>512112092
I'd say a lot of this "nazi" talk is because of mass, unchecked migration by some of the worst, angriest, most resentful third-worlders on the planet. They see their countries being invaded without any stopping, being told by resentful foreigners that they have no place in their own homelands, they have no history or culture, don't deserve to live, aren't protected against violence from them, etc. You can't keep doing that and expect Westerners to smile politely as societal cohesion deterioates in real-time and the government enacts more draconian policies that only apply to the actual citizens (the descendants of those that built the country) to prevent them from noticing, talking about, or taking action against what's going on.

And the danger of people like you who call this "nazi ideology" when it's really basic cultural preservation that any other nation would find common sensical is that you are, in fact, lowering the ideological threshhold a tolerant person has in accepting actual nazi ideology. It's a variation on Voltaire's observation
>if this is the best of all possible worlds, what must the others be like?
Now it's,
>if wanting to preserve my country, my people and my culture is nazism, why is nazism bad?
You are, in effect trivializing nazism, which actual nazis and the actual far-right have 0 problems with.