>>510097563
You'd think that after the big stink leftists made about the palestinian ethnic cleanse they'd be more open to recognizing Israel's malicious actions in general, perhaps enough to notice that we're subject to them too.
>>510097760
Unless there's some salacious "there" there, then I sincerely doubt any actual innocent parties being named would be subject to more than half a week's news cycle. If the MSM smelled blood in the water and wanted to chase ratings they'd focus on the accusations of substance, since those details are the meat of a story. Look at how quickly accusations against celebrities fall apart without any serious evidence put forwards, hell they sometimes just go away even WITH some substantial evidence made public.
>release names of people with evidence against them
I don't disagree and that's clearly the place to start. Since Epstein and Maxwell were jailed, there was obviously an investigation, there were obviously victims named (can remain anon), one can only presume that the DOD understands WHO was implicated by those victims and that investigations were undertaken. That much AT LEAST should be publically available.
>>510097962
>Because we don't trust them to pick and choose who has enough evidence to warrant being released
This too, though. I want it all, let the public sort through everything since it's become beyond obvious that our intelligence agencies are compromised and not to be trusted.