>>213090261
Not just that, but he suggested 3 alternative indicators that would make China look *better* on paper. So his point is that GDP is actually not showing China's growth enough. That moron is literally quoting someone who's arguing against his point lmao
To clarify, I don't agree with what Li Keqiang said, but he's the one who brought it up.
>>213090300
>no argument
I accept your concession. You also receive the article illiteracy award of the day lol

>cehape kazanınca

>>936936729
dont be mean to boomer, he is not creative enough to come up with an insult lmaoooooooooo

>>212491765
KEK