Search Results
7/2/2025, 10:23:31 PM
>>509336464
>So I can't tell if this is liberal fear mongering for their audience
Most likely this, not falling far from the constant Handmaiden's Tale fantasizing. Still interesting that he felt the need to come out and announce it. I'm guessing as he was Dubya's bitch, he's fishing for some protests before the summer ends, to help bolster the case for keeping birthright citizenship for illegals, to make the Bush-friendly corporate cronies feel confident that they will still be able to use their pseudo-slave labor in the future.
>>509336587
>That still doesn't mean they actually had a nuke.
I didn't say they did. I asked you to account for the highly enriched uranium.
>Not an argument.
Now you're making up shit I didn't say and responding to it instead of responding to my request for you to explain why Iran has so much highly enriched uranium. What is your deal? I thought you were trying to be Mr. Reasonable.
>Go die for Netanyahu's political career.
Okay, you've melted down now. Is my request for what Iran is doing with all that highly enriched uranium that much of a bother to you? What's your deal? Are you an Iran shill hiding under a US flag, which is why you have better understanding than most of the separatist factions in Iran? Why are you so upset about my very simple question about why Iran has tons of material that has no conceivable purpose other than for weapons development?
You can just call me a miganigger if it makes you feel better. The fact that you melted down in response to very civil conversation is very curious.
>So I can't tell if this is liberal fear mongering for their audience
Most likely this, not falling far from the constant Handmaiden's Tale fantasizing. Still interesting that he felt the need to come out and announce it. I'm guessing as he was Dubya's bitch, he's fishing for some protests before the summer ends, to help bolster the case for keeping birthright citizenship for illegals, to make the Bush-friendly corporate cronies feel confident that they will still be able to use their pseudo-slave labor in the future.
>>509336587
>That still doesn't mean they actually had a nuke.
I didn't say they did. I asked you to account for the highly enriched uranium.
>Not an argument.
Now you're making up shit I didn't say and responding to it instead of responding to my request for you to explain why Iran has so much highly enriched uranium. What is your deal? I thought you were trying to be Mr. Reasonable.
>Go die for Netanyahu's political career.
Okay, you've melted down now. Is my request for what Iran is doing with all that highly enriched uranium that much of a bother to you? What's your deal? Are you an Iran shill hiding under a US flag, which is why you have better understanding than most of the separatist factions in Iran? Why are you so upset about my very simple question about why Iran has tons of material that has no conceivable purpose other than for weapons development?
You can just call me a miganigger if it makes you feel better. The fact that you melted down in response to very civil conversation is very curious.
Page 1