>>60638067
it is but you retarded dimwits have never checked a money supply model and it shows with very obvious consequences as you see posts like these on the regular. With a fixed money supply, public consumer money mass contracts which forces prices to go down on the long term. And when it's a one time price raise and not a sustained one, it isn't inflation. Quite on the contrary, as wages (w) don't increase to offset the price raise (p) therefore real wages (w/p) go lower, public consumer money decreases, unemployment goes up as opportunity cost decreases and as consquence inflation goes down. (Basic phillips and beveridge curve will tell you this correlation) Why? Because companies have nowhere to recirculate this money and public money mass, contracts. Therefore, tariffs are deflationary. But arguing with retards is non-fruitful anyway.
I'm going to make this substantially easy to understand, so your smooth brain captures it. Suppose you have two parks that are connected between each other. Suppose ticket supply was fixed and that each game in each park took equal tickets to participate in and that utility was equal for every consumer in every game. Suppose, now, that to circulate from Park A to Park B you now have to pay an access fee of 1 ticket. (Tariff effect). With rigid prices, this is recessionary, as every costumer would like to use Park A. With flexible prices (real life), Park B necessitates to lower the access to each of their attractions by a proportional amount to the tariff, otherwise they run out of business. Ticket supply hasn't increased because the park has a "very limited-ticket printing policy" and therefore the tariff was deflationary. You get it now, you retard?