>>40646732
Thats usually the case though. I remember hearing another recent study that showed Jews favored some race policy more if it was more adverse to whites.

Its easy to misinterpret these things though. I know a lot of people jump to the idea of some silent conspiracy. But theres another far more plausible explanation.

Imagine if you considered yourself white and were disproportionately wealthy and wanted to virtue signal your lack of racial animosity. In that case, you might be more inclined to 'go native' and signal a humility for being, in your mind, white also.

Many Jews do genuinely consider themselves to be white, and the definition of ethnicity for them is a murky one, while simultaneously believing they are Jewish.

So they play both cards and people read it as subversive. Which it very well may be, but not intentionally for the reasons people assume.

That said, there are a disproportionate amount of anti white race hustlers who are Jewish and do organize for anti white aims. But it is not in the way or for the reasons most people assume, and certainly not at the scale. Ultimately, the question is "Does that really matter if integrating Jews into your leadership has the same outcome?"

Its how they, as a group, gain so much distrust, and why so many of them are truely, genuinely baffled why.

For example, people who looking to detect threat patterns see this and assume the pattern suggests conspiracy, instead of understanding that through nepotism and networking, Jews tend to promote each other like any other familiar group, and tend to share liberal politics (because they can afford to).

Jews tend to be victims of their own success, and of each others. So to us outsiders, it all looks the same.

But again, the question to those seeking defense of our interests, the question remains, 'does it matter how or why if the effect is the same?'