Probably no man before the French Revolution ever had to seriously contemplate the feminine prerogative
>physically weak, not a threat
>they aren't allowed to vote because that would be retarded
>barred from financial independence, so thornbacks couldn't cope about being "succesful"
>discouraged from higher education and legal office

But because the missionary generation made a huge oopsie with sufferage, western society suddenly finds itself in an unprecedented lunar paradigm where most methods of male power (violence, physical superiority, third places etc.) are suppressed by legal fictions while not accounting for female tendencies (gossip, shrilling, lese-suitor, shaming)

Wouldn't it be worthwhile for a contemporary man to know what he's dealing with on a biological and evopsych level when navigating the gynocracy?