>>511053916
>Basically 100% of their industrial success is IP they have stolen from the West.
Repeating a cope will not make it true, China has more research capacity than the US, and the margin is not small.

>>511023588
>(heavens forbid)
Behold, heavens.

>>510901805
The real question, why is the US behind?

>>510240821
Are these so-called Chinese officials in the room with us right now?

>>510239929
>remember kid: No market processes = No innovation
Yeah... meanwhile in real life, the more you purge the free-market, the more you innovate.

>>510056262
>>510056301
It's ok, no matter what the US will lead in techs that matter.

>>509501522
history proves this method works
we see china using their minerals processing dominance to begin to establish a tributary system of sorts, elon musk will have to convince Xi why he needs magnets, this means elon musk has to make china happy
at the same time, china is bringing any country which will accept their co-operation into the modern era by sharing technology and building industry, their goal is to be the rising tide that lifts all ships, this is the real effective way to stay on top of the world and safe, as opposed to the wectoid kike doctrine of trying to drag everyone down
the future is chinese, and it's a bright future

>>509468237
>is one of the few technological/scientific bright spots of this age.
Progress is happening in many areas, if just doesn't make the news when certain country makes it...

>>509402209
I use my AC at work when it's above 30º to bring it to 30º, it avoids that excessive heat that brings indolence and laziness.

>>509402272