>>716125976

>>511037044

>>509848505
Did you read the image? They were not trafficked or kidnapped. It seems like they were sloots who were hired willingly and paid well. Note I am only going by that image, if it turns out it's a bullshit shill, I will retract my statements.

I am basically just stating that there is a huge distinction between underage and pedo. This is nothing about feels, if anything, you are the feels fag, because the legal reason that 14-17 can't be touched is the feelings of the suffragettes that got the legal age laws put in place. And they did it to further retain their own sexual market value. There is no actual biological argument or reason why you shouldn't fuck a girl once she's hit puberty and is able to carry a child to term. Humans did it for all of human history and it's a modern abberation to have teenagers be unavailable.

Here look at pic related, things used to be so wild in regards to age of consent that my 14 lower limit seems prudish in comparison.

>>212088805