>>24571240
Baconian inductivism is a specific conception of science, it is in fact at odds with others that we would equally consider scientific.

I think Jung has a good concept of method. The emerging discussion for him and others is that there are differences of method according to different areas of research, and this is lost on people. Husserl talks about this best in his Krisis. People seem to have agreed to limit all inquiries to the imitation of physics, and a pretty misbegotten concept of it at that.

Anyways the Jungian method is in part just to observe the human subject from many angles - as in, through the lens of multiple fields. Myth, biology, etc.

There remains a sense of rigorous empirical method. But other things (read, the other 80% of reality precluded by the typical method) may be looked at along the way.

Attached are some remarks from Jung on phil of science