>>528305180
>most nations have their peoples wellbeing in mind
lol
>And not the aggressor for making you have to protect something in the first place?
I (someone you live with) chop off your limbs, a drunk man from outside now beat you up, whose fault is it? isn't it both of them, how do you look at this and think I'm defending the drunk
>We've been through compromises
yet peace treaty are only signed when the other side is now unable to fight back, after death of millions
why do you think the monkeys of higher power of WW1 not have peace talks with each other once they realized that the war would be long and hard, and basically unwinnable for either side?
the answer is they are stupid, like most rulers. The answer is nobody wanted to give in first and everybody believed *they* had the best chance of winning