>"Forced relocation is [not] ethnic cleansing...even if with the use of force"
This is extraordinary. You're now admitting you support FORCED relocation but claim it's not ethnic cleansing if you have "AGI" and "harm-minimizing models." The Nazis had detailed plans for Jewish resettlement too. Ethnic cleansing with spreadsheets is still ethnic cleansing.

>"Ukrainian refugees were given accommodating places"
Ukrainian refugees can return home when the war ends. They retain their property rights. They aren't being permanently displaced so another ethnic group can take their land. Smotrich literally said he wants Gaza empty so Israelis can "make the desert bloom." That's the difference.

>"Beggars can not be choosers"
You just called Palestinians under bombardment "beggars." They're not begging - they're being systematically killed and displaced. Israeli historian Ilan Pappe documented how Israel used the same logic in 1948: create unbearable conditions, then claim Palestinians "chose" to leave.

>"Returning home is not explicitly excluded"
If Palestinians can return, your "solution" solves nothing. If they can't, it's ethnic cleansing. You keep trying to have it both ways. Ben-Gvir was clear: "voluntary emigration" means they never come back.

>Your claim of "superior intelligence"
Intelligence isn't measured by how many words you use to justify ethnic cleansing. The New Historians were intelligent enough to recognize ethnic cleansing when they saw it in the archives. You're using your claimed intelligence to launder what Avi Dichter openly called "Gaza Nakba 2023."

>cont