>>530421435
Intellectual posturing and a critique of superficial archaic grammar creating specious critical authority: sound and fury, nothing more. Though it is doubtlessly lost on the rabble, you should be ashamed, should you even possess a shred of good faith and/or affinity for reason, at the utter vapidity of your primary - or, rather, sole - argument; for the reduction of the intellectual history of the entirity of western civilization to [a paradoxically] "'ancient'" synoecism between Celts, Germans and Romance people" (which as a grouping is either superficial or arbitrary) without any substantiation indicates that the ornate argumentative and syntactical appareling of your post is nothing more than a vapid attempt to tip the scales in your favor through style alone. The magnanimity of reason necessitates, conversely, that I engage not with style but with substance; and to that end require you to engage with the argument which I shall now summarize in case you have difficultly parsing. Prove:
>how the triggering of the masculine protective instinct as a primary or sole desideratum for male partner seeking behavior DOES NOT require the female incapable and inferior
>how the reduction of a prospective partner to a permanent position incapability and inferiority, or the position of the aforementioned as selection criteria, ISNT emasculating insofar as it one's own capabilities and superiority are maintained artificially
>if it ISNT emasculating, prove how seeking/desiring parity between partners - even if it is an unattainable ideal - is less desirable than necessitating inferiority (by any metric)
>how contemporary IRL European standards delegitimize the characterization of a Maori inspired fire goddess as of dual nature encompassing both the destructive and creative aspects of fire
>how this doesnt parallel Aphrodite/Aphrodite Areia, Athena, Sophia, etc....

>>530416809
Nice.