>>40755987
the relation to mother mary i think is also very interesting. in my head ive been somehow thinking of a sort of “christian polytheism”. to me what is interesting about polytheism is that it embraces the fact that there are multiple different modes of being, and it supports a relation to the divine that is not ontotheological. at the same time there is also the question that someone like peterson would pose of how ought these different polytheistic faiths interact with eachother. you can always think of a bit of a highest level. from this i was thinking about maybe yahweh somehow fitting into it though there is a lot of jewish jingoistic baggage. there is also the fact that we can understand trinitarian doctrine as christ’s flesh as revelation of the being of the logos, hence jesus’s divinity is related to ontological theophany rather than metaphysics. if this was the case, what of the theotokos? she birthed the revelatory flesh, hence establishing her as a being that is intimately related to the bringing about of manifestation. insofar as she is the bringing about, an aspect of her is thus beyond manifestation hence cthonic. this leads to her representation as hekate. oh yeah there is an astrological bit in all of this also how jesus was associated in some passages of the bible w the morning star and ishtar of course being the morning star too..