Spend within your means.

>>105583073
Sometimes mildly wrong but well understood is better than completely correct but a conceptual black box.

I've had these types of things happen, and usually I'm missing something. Here it may be
>we don't want these fields to become actionable right now
>the wrong version is someone's vanity "pet" thing and fucking with it would piss them off
>maybe fixing it would best be done later as "subsequent" work and included as a sure thing into a clusterfuck of other tentative things
>maybe your code is absolutely schizo autism incarnate and this is just a more polite way of telling you