>>508675860
> East Baltic, Dinaric, Romance, Alpine, and Fälish race.
Are you literally this dense or do I have to repeat myself for the 6 gorlillionth time?
>I argued against Hitler for being anti-White. You still defend him because you are a dirty turk.
No, you're getting confused again. The Soviets were anti-white which is why they killed tens of millions of white Russians. Hitler was pro-white which is why he wanted to save Europe.
> he was serious about dealing with the Jews he wouldn't have launched a war of genocide against Slavs
He didn't.
>Hitler: Slavs were subhumans and racially inferior
Hitler never called slavs 'subhuman'. As far as the racially inferior part, that was the norm of the time. Again, the Russian people, even their most learned men, thought the same of the Germans and regularly called them inferior. But you don't have problem with that type of racism, you only have a problem when racism is done to you. Hitler literally explains in the chapter of Mein Kampf, part of which I already posted, that he was a witness to the constant bombardment side of anti-German racism from the Russian side which led to his hostile feelings of untrust towards Russia. Germany and Russia were enemies because Russia saw itself as Pan-Slavist that sought to dominate both Germany and Austria. Nevertheless, he never hated the Russian people and later said that his writings in Mein Kampf had aged as the continental system and European politics had massively shifted by the time he came to power.
nice headcanon
>targeted the families of dissidents and partisans (who you seem to hate - totally justified, btw, considering it was a war of genocide).
yes, partisans should be killed en masse. The Soviets, Americans and British did the same, I don't know why you're excluding them.