Agreed
But if being very strict on the definition then all love is conditional
To love somebody/something is conditional on them being themselves/it-being-itself
Everything is conditional if it's to have a subject (be subjected to? The subject of? Idk)
The condition is the subject
Ya know what I mean?

But if we be more lax
Then conditional is just a spectrum
Some love is more conditional than others
The typical examples being the love of a mother towards their child being less conditional than say the love of a gold digger for a rich man

Perhaps the fault is in the word love
Love is too ambiguous and broad
It could mean just any positive affect

It is a fault in the limitations of language and etymology or something something tautology/redundancy axioms lala nya nya
Like, love itself is conditional because of the very nature of it, the definition of it, carries condition-ality as a constraint
Things you love are things you love, a limited selective pool
Ain't no infinite love
Blah blah blah

Once we put exceptions
I'll love you
Except for this
Except for that
Then it's no longer conditional
A supreme mother's love
Le God's love is unconditional! Hahaha! Doesn't exist!

There's also the capacity to hate
An small animal can't do much to make you hate them, maybe indifference
A human can do a lot of things to turn your love into hate

What is hate?
Blah blah
Unconditional hate?