>>510985773
>You seem to believe his art was worth that much
50k to random art collectors. Can you show me which transaction you think was shady. Do you think you buy the president with 50k? And yes his art isn't bad it's pretty good compared to shit I've seen in galleries that go for thousands by no-name artists. I don't deny his name helps him, but for the same reason a shitty napkin doodle by John Lennon might cost a lot or why George W Bush's paintings go for a lot.

It's not enough to go
>WELL HE STARTED MAKING PAINTINGS SO IT MUST BE CORRUPTION
You need to prove it. Prove it by who bought it? Was it politicians in other countries or Ukrainian oligarchs? Or was it known art collectors etc?