Search Results
7/10/2025, 11:21:39 PM
>>24538208
I don't condone what I said about you not deserving another word. It was very anti intellectual to assume you are lying. See? Honesty. Now kill yourself dishonest faggot.
>>24538206
Subjective information is information that multiple interpretations of that information can come to a different conclusion on. Objective information is information that must have the same conclusions regardless of who or how they go about interpretation.
Math is a projection of values over the world that may be accurate only if you assume 1 = 1 or + is addition etc. But if you do not share those values, if you simply interpret the signifiers differently, another model math becomes different from yours and so subjective. You will not find an example of otherwise.
>but that is not math
Math is a label. You don't have to assign any particular system of values to it, which makes it subjective. The underlying process, the world, our brains, that is objective information.
Math is only objective insofar as it is a physical processes in the brain, and the brain is objective. Not a projection.
Mathematical systems which I assume are what you mean when you say math is objective, those are subjective. They're an abstract fallacy that require agreements between a few people, not all people, to function. Like the value of money.
I don't condone what I said about you not deserving another word. It was very anti intellectual to assume you are lying. See? Honesty. Now kill yourself dishonest faggot.
>>24538206
Subjective information is information that multiple interpretations of that information can come to a different conclusion on. Objective information is information that must have the same conclusions regardless of who or how they go about interpretation.
Math is a projection of values over the world that may be accurate only if you assume 1 = 1 or + is addition etc. But if you do not share those values, if you simply interpret the signifiers differently, another model math becomes different from yours and so subjective. You will not find an example of otherwise.
>but that is not math
Math is a label. You don't have to assign any particular system of values to it, which makes it subjective. The underlying process, the world, our brains, that is objective information.
Math is only objective insofar as it is a physical processes in the brain, and the brain is objective. Not a projection.
Mathematical systems which I assume are what you mean when you say math is objective, those are subjective. They're an abstract fallacy that require agreements between a few people, not all people, to function. Like the value of money.
Page 1