Search Results
6/17/2025, 7:49:05 PM
>>17769626
>There is no archeological evidence of heterosexual sex on par with the type of archeological evidence that you are requesting as evidence of Celtic pederasty. Does that mean we can assume that heterosexual sex did not exist in Celtic society? No, the vast majority of practices of ancient societies do not show up in the archeological record. Your argument is ridiculous.
Except there is, heterosexual sex can be assumed in a culture which does not die out. It is necessary and simple to the continued existence of a society, child rape is not.
>How many Celtic artistic depictions of sex between men and women exist?
The Wikipedia on Celtic deities often has them depicted in male-female pairings in various reliefs
>I never claimed it did.
So you are walking back a claim you made that everyone can go check>>17767867
>whereas pederasty was pervasive in pre-Judaized European societies
You have been caught making polemical statements with minimal evidence and then coping when this is pointed out, there is no way to misinterpret or misread what you said, you claimed that pederasty was pervasive in pre-Christian, there is not evidence such that it is. This is partially because we lack sources from the Celts and Germans (which had cultures that spanned millennia) and so making definitive statements about certain points in time is retarded nor does it lend itself to "pervasive" pederasty. Further where we do have evidence of Pederasty it was not universally praiseworthy, legal nor always sexual in its manifestation, sometimes it was a tutelage based relationship. You posted a Xenephon passage which demonstrated exactly that. Rome had the Lex Scantinia a law specifically designed to outlaw Pederasty from the Republican period and later Laws like the Lex Julia which were even stricter.
>There is no archeological evidence of heterosexual sex on par with the type of archeological evidence that you are requesting as evidence of Celtic pederasty. Does that mean we can assume that heterosexual sex did not exist in Celtic society? No, the vast majority of practices of ancient societies do not show up in the archeological record. Your argument is ridiculous.
Except there is, heterosexual sex can be assumed in a culture which does not die out. It is necessary and simple to the continued existence of a society, child rape is not.
>How many Celtic artistic depictions of sex between men and women exist?
The Wikipedia on Celtic deities often has them depicted in male-female pairings in various reliefs
>I never claimed it did.
So you are walking back a claim you made that everyone can go check>>17767867
>whereas pederasty was pervasive in pre-Judaized European societies
You have been caught making polemical statements with minimal evidence and then coping when this is pointed out, there is no way to misinterpret or misread what you said, you claimed that pederasty was pervasive in pre-Christian, there is not evidence such that it is. This is partially because we lack sources from the Celts and Germans (which had cultures that spanned millennia) and so making definitive statements about certain points in time is retarded nor does it lend itself to "pervasive" pederasty. Further where we do have evidence of Pederasty it was not universally praiseworthy, legal nor always sexual in its manifestation, sometimes it was a tutelage based relationship. You posted a Xenephon passage which demonstrated exactly that. Rome had the Lex Scantinia a law specifically designed to outlaw Pederasty from the Republican period and later Laws like the Lex Julia which were even stricter.
Page 1