>>105872408
>>105872435
I bought from BCLEAR and the lenses I got were accurate to the prescription. I got the 1.60 MR-8 lenses and they're pretty good, there's slightly less chromatic aberration than on the 1.67 lenses I had before.
Try to make your "frame PD" (lens width+bridge) close to your PD, the lenses will be thicker than they should and you'll have more distortion at the visible edges if you don't.
The lenses with the least distortion issues are MR-8 (1.60) and CR-39 ("thick plastic", 1.50 index, not to be confused with chinese lenses with a higher index that the sellers label as CR-39 even though it can't be that) and MR-8 (1.60) lenses. Zenni's 1.61 is actually MR-8.
IMO frames with a lens height over 35mm are more comfortable too. I hated anti-blue light coating when I tried it so I think you should only try it if returns/changes are free, filters that mess with the real colors are not for everyone.

Wait
>>105872544
>problem is I need -0.25 on R and -1.0 on L, I couldn't find any other that go so little
That really is barely anything. You need 1.50 index/CR-39/basic/plastic lenses, "upgrades" will lead you to lenses that are actually worse for you.
On Zenni or any other site like that, choose single vision clear lenses with basic 1.50 index. You should get anti-reflective coating unless you want to be able to watch TV while facing away from the screen. Zenni includes "basic" lenses like those in the frame price, charging $5 for cheap AR coating, competitors probably do the same