>>509711069
>>509711069
>none of your anecdotes contradict the reality of my claim
This claim?
> women aren't attracted to looks at all
That's an uggo cope.
If you are hot as a man, it's a completely different plane of existence:
- You will clean up 9s and 10s even on the dating apps, whereas an average dude would have to swipe right literally 2000 times to get 1 date with a fat whale.
- Women would approach you
- You can say stupid or obnoxious shit to them, and they will still giggle and want you

How sheltered are you that this is even an argument?
Do you not see what's going on around you? Did you never know any hot friends?
What is a suitable proof for you? (Mind you, you have not shown any for your claim.)
Also, my examples are not really anecdotes of "I know some guy that..." These a huge, high publicity, well-documented examples.

Would the actual scientific studies do the trick?
Here, a quick google away:
> Are looks more important than personality when choosing a man?
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170404104722.htm
> It was also found that daughters are pickier than their parents when it comes to choosing between potential mates. Mothers rated all men, even the least attractive ones, as potentially desirable partners for their daughters, while the younger women did not.

> Daughters on the other hand prefer an attractive man, no matter how respectful, friendly, ambitious or intelligent he may be.

Here lies the answer to why our society is cooked:
Parents no longer select the mates for their daughters, and young women are horrible at mate selection. Young women prefer to go solely for hot bad boys, even it's a low-IQ criminal (in fact, a criminal is even better for them: see Wade Wilson - 4000 love letters in a week for being a serial murderer of women).