Search Results
6/19/2025, 12:28:35 PM
>>81540659
Yeah so far as the expanse of our universe I suppose, but I'd say if you travelled far enough in any given direction yes there'd more more such, just like there are many galaxies. I don't think it's presumptive of me to be open minded about this, in fact I reckon it's presumptive of most of the scientific establishment to presume our universe is the one and all, it could be one amongst trillions. If you assume space is endless in all directions - and assuming it is NOT is a lot more presumptive imho, as it'd require some sort of hard boundary where you just couldn't travel any further, what physical laws would that obey? - then it's inevitable it'd just be other universes like ours forever.
>>81540791
>there has to be a logical basis--in this case (CONK CREET) pre-established Physics--behind that assumption otherwise you're wasting time and resources proving wild chase of goose
Tell that to large swathes of modern science which is inundated with random theories like dark matter, spacetime, and even stuff they built upon other theories from before, like a stack of cards waiting to be toppled.
>My point exactly.
How so? I haven't used the scientific method for my theories, because it would be impossible. The scale of existence isn't something we can confirm or deny. Ideas and discussion are the only medium for it, to shoot them down as ridiculous and unproductive? 99% of the shit on the internet is unproductive. Why fixate on someone proposing theories about existence? At least offer arguments instead of just insults and "you can't prove shit so you are an idiot" level ad hominem, lad.
>whole thread reads like a conversation between freshman Physics students who think they're hot shit
I am in my mid thirties anon and have been obsessed with this topic for at least a decade. Do have a degree but not in physics.
Yeah so far as the expanse of our universe I suppose, but I'd say if you travelled far enough in any given direction yes there'd more more such, just like there are many galaxies. I don't think it's presumptive of me to be open minded about this, in fact I reckon it's presumptive of most of the scientific establishment to presume our universe is the one and all, it could be one amongst trillions. If you assume space is endless in all directions - and assuming it is NOT is a lot more presumptive imho, as it'd require some sort of hard boundary where you just couldn't travel any further, what physical laws would that obey? - then it's inevitable it'd just be other universes like ours forever.
>>81540791
>there has to be a logical basis--in this case (CONK CREET) pre-established Physics--behind that assumption otherwise you're wasting time and resources proving wild chase of goose
Tell that to large swathes of modern science which is inundated with random theories like dark matter, spacetime, and even stuff they built upon other theories from before, like a stack of cards waiting to be toppled.
>My point exactly.
How so? I haven't used the scientific method for my theories, because it would be impossible. The scale of existence isn't something we can confirm or deny. Ideas and discussion are the only medium for it, to shoot them down as ridiculous and unproductive? 99% of the shit on the internet is unproductive. Why fixate on someone proposing theories about existence? At least offer arguments instead of just insults and "you can't prove shit so you are an idiot" level ad hominem, lad.
>whole thread reads like a conversation between freshman Physics students who think they're hot shit
I am in my mid thirties anon and have been obsessed with this topic for at least a decade. Do have a degree but not in physics.
Page 1