>>511449596
he's a jeet for believing ghandi didnt take money from people, and so are you
>>511449956
I like your lack of defeatism, anon. But Hitler was funded and supported all the way by the same jewish bankers who'd propped up Lenin too

>>509691513
>He relies on Ernst 'Putzi' Hanfstaengl
No he doesn't 'rely' on him in any way. He's only mentioned as
>up to the mid-1930s anyway, an informal link between the Nazi elite and the White House
and Sutton (incorrectly, I believe) dismisses the possibility he was a US intel asset all along
But none of what Sutton argues about Wall Street funding of the NSDAP relies on Hanfstaengl in any way
>He relies on Fritz Thyssen's 'I Paid Hitler
No he doesn't. He actually repudiates that book and dismisses most of its claims (pp. 70, 76). Have you even read Sutton's book? It's right here https://archive.org/details/sutton-wall-street-and-hitler
He does point out Thyssen's link to Wall Street e.g. via his Dutch front bank to Harriman cs.
>Sutton's claims about the 1933 Dutch book 'The Financial Sources of National Socialism' (originally 'Three Conversations with Hitler') published under the pseudonym 'Sidney Warburg'
Well now I'm sure you haven't even read Sutton's book, because that particular book is treated extensively by him in a chapter literally titled THE MYTH OF SYDNEY WARBURG (pp. 96)
> it was also explicitly denied by James Warburg in 1947
Imagine trusting a kike, ever
Imagine trusting a kike financier
Imagine trusting a kike financier who funded both bolsheviks and nazis
Imagine trusting a kike financier who funded both bolsheviks and nazis and denies such after the war because it's an ANTISEMITIC TROPE

>>509154625
Read the book I posted, it addresses Reds vs Whites in detail
Also of course it doesn't mean the West wouldn't collude with bolsheviks once in power
And as usual there's the same banking kikes funding both sides

ah ok