>>279814430

>It was in 1999...
That's several years after the series had already finished. How can it be considered canon continuation, when Frieza is still alive and Vegeta become an indentured slave once again?
>That part when the ship was about to crash land.
I've just rewatched that scene and cannot see anything wrong with it.
>Based on the characters from the previous series, yes.
GT is about the characters and the the original story, even the original author described GT as being the original Dragon Ball.
>It doesn't exist?
It doesn't appear too.
>I'm pretty sure he was aware of his own abilities, I think was created with that knowledge, he knew he could heal the dog and Mr. Satan.
How come the gas seperated the magic of the earrings, but not the Fusion Dance?
>Yes, and that made that part of DB, not his work, right?
It still included involvement and approval from the original author, right?
>Okay...
Next post.
>Hmm, they all think before acting, Pan just kicks and destroys things like Buu did...
Doesn't that prove my theory?
>Goku?
Yes.
>Could it be that the anime staff made a mistake?
Is it not customary to hold rocket launchs in the morning? It's obvious that Goku needed to get himself ready for the space adventure.
>What? Why not, he's a super saiyan.
What about Goku, Gohan and Pan's potential?
>What about Pan???
Pan could've easily defeated him in SS..
>School...
Mr. Satan's dojo? Pan is a steadfast student..
>Proof?
What? Pic related?

>>279814466

>An accident would be something non intentional...
It still counts as an accident. Why? Because Pan's expression conveys that she never meant to inflict that much damage..
>What about Pan, the only time we saw her with the sack was when she stole it from Trunks.
We need to know the origin of that sack and who had it first..
>Does that give her the right to attack him?
Pan was acting in self-defence and holds no responsibility for what happened to the Tsufurian people.

Continued..