Search Results
8/7/2025, 10:24:17 AM
Words are good lettering, but humans treat words as linguistic intelligence. This is subhuman, it's akin to being a word mammal, which is stupidity. Use words to write instructions, label things and for business purposes, but talk using the natural wordless voice box which is complex. Every utterance in word and more is possible, and communicating would be as easy as going with your heart and saying something, only for the other people to understand exactly what you mean. We live in a word world of word abusers making horrible reality based on words. Words need to be treated as the technology they are and not tattooed to our minds via 'linguistic intelligence'.
8/5/2025, 12:16:13 PM
>>40857695
Shut up faggot. You know nothing. You have a feel from reading some nerd score you.
Shut up faggot. You know nothing. You have a feel from reading some nerd score you.
7/16/2025, 5:11:30 PM
>>40731793
If I understand the problem correctly, this is really hard to tackle for me because im not particularly religious, despite seeing a lot of valuable /x/ material present in at least most of them. So, first id say that I was referencing perfect good and perfect evil as approaches to infinity. That is to say, good may approach perfect good forever and vice versa evil but theyre asymptoted by the concept of perfection. At least as humans understand it.
As far as how religious people seem to approach this is just
>God works in ways that humans cant understand, so its an important part of the greater good but another human will never be able to explain it to you.
This is non-falsifiable so it is literally impossible to dispute. Anything you say will be reduced to
>all part of the perfect plan, you just don't get it
Maybe there's some validity to that but do to the nonfalsifiable nature of the argument there's also no way to dig any deeper. It just ends there. Personally, I dont like that kind of talk about what humans "can never understand". "Not understood presently" would be more palatable for me. Maybe people knew something in the past or will in the future. We shouldn't put our lack of understanding on everyone else for all time, even if only because it is rude kek
If I understand the problem correctly, this is really hard to tackle for me because im not particularly religious, despite seeing a lot of valuable /x/ material present in at least most of them. So, first id say that I was referencing perfect good and perfect evil as approaches to infinity. That is to say, good may approach perfect good forever and vice versa evil but theyre asymptoted by the concept of perfection. At least as humans understand it.
As far as how religious people seem to approach this is just
>God works in ways that humans cant understand, so its an important part of the greater good but another human will never be able to explain it to you.
This is non-falsifiable so it is literally impossible to dispute. Anything you say will be reduced to
>all part of the perfect plan, you just don't get it
Maybe there's some validity to that but do to the nonfalsifiable nature of the argument there's also no way to dig any deeper. It just ends there. Personally, I dont like that kind of talk about what humans "can never understand". "Not understood presently" would be more palatable for me. Maybe people knew something in the past or will in the future. We shouldn't put our lack of understanding on everyone else for all time, even if only because it is rude kek
Page 1