>>510020003
That is not true. That is how old AI worked and when it was retarded. Modern AI is good because it projects inputs into "meaning space"/embedded space. a 1400D simulation of actual meaning (a space where all things that are similar are close and all things that are dissimilar are far apart), and all responses are based on outputting something that ticks all the boxes in embedded space that the user asked for. The reason it's so good is because it works with a pretty close (seems like) mapping of meaning itself, not what was the most often word that followed this kind of sentence in the past.

So you can get really good results if you use the right words. One of my favourite addendums to a research prompt is "trusting no agencies, from first principles", because you essentially set it off in a good area of embedded space.

t. programmer and studied this. pic unrelated

>>509955044
DIGITS.
The funny part is ALL the zionist infiltrators on the right are now caught robo posting talking points. It's a who's who of MIGA.

And even more hysterical is now EVERYONE is raging demaning the release. Finally, we're united...the left screaming because they're sure Trump's in them and the right raging because promise made promise broken.

And just like that? EVERYONE wants to see the Epstein Files and the fn Jews are under a rock holding their breath.

Guess who died shortly before Epstein? Ears are a 100% match--my only question is--was there some sort of breeding farm for these creatures? Because I can't sort out how it is possible that Tony looks so much like Jeff.

Weird that.

>>509886866
So numerals eh?

So who was the body on the gurney the talking box told us was Epstein? When was that image taken?
Let's look at some ears, they're as good as fingerprints.

I took a known image of Epstein and turned it sideways and compared left ears of the dead dude on the gurney and Epstein--NO MATCH.

Whose ear did dead gurney guy's match? TONY RODHAM who had died a few weeks before "Epstein".