>>508330724
>Picrel.
I can list plenty of atrocities and gloat while saying they are "not real capitalism".
Your kneejerk reaction is understandable but factually inappropriate.
Tyranny, atrocity and genocide arises from more than just assertions about how the economic order.
You don't even care half as much about these atrocities as you feign, they are a prop to you.
>we don't have this distinction
You are right, "left", "right", "communism", "capitalism":
These terms cannot be used prescriptively, only descriptively - if one wants a coherent discussion about the current goings on on flows of politics and thoughts in a society rather than meaningless pretenses of taxonomy masquerading as dialog that is.
Yanukovich was more defined by his corruption, autocracy and mafia-state nature than any pretenses of left-wing or right-wing social or economic ideas or whatever other indicators one tries to structure observable reality along.
My mistake was trying to play along with your "I know what the left can do" shtick.
Instead of attempting to countersignal by describing various undesirable political movements as "right-wing" (which they are) I should have just calling it out like I did above.
Because instead of a reconsideration of the meaning of words I just got a continuation along the rail of regarding these words in their proscriptive misuse rather than their descriptive usefulness in this discussion about politics and the current uselessness and inefficacy of technocratic centrism in declining western democracies.