>>105572684
Yeah, I think that would explain it. Thanks for the 411.
There are not that many 3rd-party resources that document how do Windows components exactly behave without all kinds of snake-oil information being circulated all around or misattributions to the point that even Andjeet-related resources from communities like XDA and the like feel more accurate in comparison. Have seen wide misconceptions about SysMain/MMAgent on Guru3D too.
>admittedly, it isn't that much documented on MS docs, either, especially on how it evolved throughout NT6 releases. i might be looking at wrong places though. gotta give Yosivovich & Co.'s Windows Internals a read, one day.

I recently came to like MSD-i mean Microsoft Learn, though. It seems fairly documented and organized, even tho I prefer MediaWiki-based stuff.
>fuck them for nuking older MSDN resources, though. I get nuking executables that won't be ever SHA256-signed - still a dick-move - but text-based resources?
>if the fucking BBC can archive old news pages (text, images and fucking RealMedia files) as early as late 90s and still have them published online, then so can Microsoft