Search Results
8/6/2025, 5:54:31 AM
>>103167905
You've never seen weaponized incompetence like boomer code written by a dude who knew that if he didn't fit a gazillion bugs into the codebase his boss would fire him after it "just worked".
Then there's the guys who never bothered learning anything beyond switch cases, all the way to today.
>If it works don't fix it
Boomer code for
>we can't refactor the code because we wrote so much useless garbage that doesn't look like it should be necessary but breaks everything as soon as you try to delete it
>Yes, the C++ program that controls this on/off button needs to be multiple GB in size
(They never took the debug info out or removed old code, because there were so many bugs that they needed it on production units to troubleshoot in the field, and the entire code base was spaghetti)
You've never seen weaponized incompetence like boomer code written by a dude who knew that if he didn't fit a gazillion bugs into the codebase his boss would fire him after it "just worked".
Then there's the guys who never bothered learning anything beyond switch cases, all the way to today.
>If it works don't fix it
Boomer code for
>we can't refactor the code because we wrote so much useless garbage that doesn't look like it should be necessary but breaks everything as soon as you try to delete it
>Yes, the C++ program that controls this on/off button needs to be multiple GB in size
(They never took the debug info out or removed old code, because there were so many bugs that they needed it on production units to troubleshoot in the field, and the entire code base was spaghetti)
Page 1