>>24537677

This is why I wouldn't make his argument, it's not worth it to corner intentions through intuitions and probability when words are fundamentally vague, you have to respect them if you want to foster knowledge or you will endlessly fight. There are those who will deny pretty much anything, or keep changing the subject. There is also to me the fear of losing self awareness, relying too much on intuitions to make points, and losing sight of the fact that even something as seemingly objective as math (the arbitrary decision to give the signifier 1 it's value) is subjective. And that 'intersubjective consistency' and 'objectivity' are synonyms, so all words are synonyms. Forgetting that comes with a lot of self awareness issues which the average individual, whose identity is composed of labels they do not understand, must face.

Instead just use brevity and more specific vocabulary lol, not like most people can tell the difference between that and actual intelligence.