>>1212680
>Literally all the footage is 1280x720
>Bitrates lower than your average trap thread on /gif/
>All gutted by YouTube compression
>AGAIN, ALL THE FOOTAGE IS 1280x720
What the fuck OP?

I appreciate the effort but seriously all of these are at such a low quality that they're pretty much unfit for anyone to use outside of having to make something for your grandma's funeral cause the family says your good with computers.

Aside from the laughable resolution, YouTube's compression has obliterated the already low quality of every single one of these. There's over 100 files in here with a data rate less than <1000kbps, they won't even look good on a phone.

For your own sake OP, if you're using these for your own projects then I'd say you're best off to just start again but at a resolution from a post bronze age era. And when you do, again, for your own sake it's probably worth the time to rename the files so half of them don't start with FREE BEST ROYALTY FREE INDIA.

>Inb4 just upscale it bro
No, just don't hinder yourself and waste time with such poor footage.

There are plenty of free resources outside of YouTube to get stock footage, and the ones that are on YouTube often have the raw uncompressed file available somewhere for free. Mass-ripping from channels may save you the time searching but will cost you time in editing.

>pic related, op why do you even have shit like this saved?