>>510397091
Someone is rightly calling out fake German (or traitor) >>510396551 saying that a European building and piece of Norwegian history going back almost a thousand years should be destroyed and burned, you seem to side with the traitor/invader ... and of course you're anti-Christian defending the guy saying to destroy parts of European history and architecture going back a millenia. The American anon wasn't "arguing about nothing" he was calling out a pos who's obviously a traitor or not even a European (and you're siding with them because you just hate Christianity so much you want the churches destroyed and will support Mohammedans in this).
You're also either a traitor or a 5th column foreigner. This isn't complicated.