SCOTUS decided so far (2024-2025 term, politically relevant cases):
Bouarfa v Mayorkas: POTUS has authority to deport those who commit immigration fraud
Royal Canin v Wullschleger: If claims relevant to federal law are withdrawn from a case, and only those relevant to state law remain, then such case cannot continue in Federal court but instead should continue in State court
Tiktok v Garland: PAFACA 1A-compliant
Williams v Reed: CRA preempts State exhaustion requirements
Waetzig v Halliburton: "Dismissed without prejudice" counts as a "final proceeding"
SF v EPA: "End result" regs exceed EPA authority
Delligatti v US: Knowingly causing death counts as "physical force"
Thompson v US: Misleading statements do not count as false
US v Miller: Citizens may file bankruptcy to discharge some fed loans
Bondi v VanDerStok: ATF exceeded authority
MedMar v Horn: RICO claims can be used when illegal drugs cause self-harm behavior
FDA v W&WLI: 5C erroneously rejected FDA vaping regs
Cunningham v Cornell: ERISA plaintiffs need only allege violations, rather than addressing potential defenses
Velazquez v Bondi: Deportations and detainments can only occur on business days
Advocate Christ MC v Kennedy: Medicare must expect less copay for disabled retirees' med bills
Feliciano v DOT: NG "emergency pay" applies during declared emergencies
Barnes v Felix: 5C "moment-of-threat" violates 4A
OK v Drummond: No decision (really)
Kousisis v US: Fraudsters who don't intend to harm victims are still liable for damages
7CIC v Eagle CO: DC Cir erred in NEPA interpretation
Ames v Ohio DoYS: 6C "background circumstances" rule illegally discriminates against White, male, straight, Christian, cisgendered, and other relevant "majority" classes of people
CC/Devas v Antrix: FSIA "implied requirements" rejected
S&W v Mexico: Mexican claim invalid
CCB v WI L&I RC: WISC violated 1A, discriminated against Catholics
Martin v US: Fedgov can be sued for SWATting