>>512732889

You'd think businesses that rely on extra expendable income would be doing their damndest to help ensure the consumer has extra money to spend, but instead they support al the typical anti-consumerist methodologies and then act all surprised when no one's got money for their even-shittier-than-ever-yet-somehow-the-most-expensive-it's-ever-been garbage products.

Whatever Boomer-niggers are left and their handful of Gen X knock-off offspring are going to discover that there is an actual limit to how much you can jew the consumer before it all collapses. Predicating your shit-ass business model on screwing the consumer for the shareholder's benefit isn't going to last much longer.