>>4439408
Pic related from your own video m8.
This is an absolute midwit attempt to compare these by the way.
>different sources
>different batches/ages
>no chain of custody from the manufacturer or even distributor
>shot in a habblesad with jank 3d printed adaptors
>too dumb to realise that the jank adaptors are putting the film plane in the wrong spot and giving incorrect focus for the Gold, conclude the gold is just a softer film (?!)
>home dev in the sink, rather than just running them side by side in an actual c41 processor
>dslr scan is actually the most scientific thing they've done, but we just have to assume that the scanning exposure is the same
>not masking the rebate, causing light piping and loss of contrast
>not editing the images to full contrast, but even at lomo-tier contrast and saturation a difference in colour balance is clearly visible
How they would do all this and still be so ignorant as to conclude that they're the same is baffling to me.
The difference I see is that the gold is recording colour differences further into the shadow areas, where the colorplus is washed out greener in the shadows, meaning you get a less vibrant image at the same edit or would need to push it harder to get the same contrast, losing shadow detail and emphasising the appearance of grain.
The differences are minor, but entirely within the scope of what film manufacturers pushed as different stocks back in the day. "Pro" film was literally just the same shit but with cold-chain storage keeping it fresher for longer, special version were released when a master roll had aged just right.
If you don't see the difference then just buy the cheaper one and you'll be happy, but know that you're on the same level as someone saying that they can't taste the difference between a $10 wine and a $50 one.