Search Results
7/22/2025, 8:28:24 PM
>>511067643
Anon, you don't know this but if she takes the pardon than she can't invoke her 5th ammendment rights in court on the matter.
>The president has pardon or clemency power under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, of the Constitution, under the Pardon Clause. The clause says the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.” While the president’s powers to pardon seem unlimited, a presidential pardon can only be issued for a federal crime, and pardons can’t be issued for impeachment cases tried and convicted by Congress.
>In 2017, retired ambassador Keith Harper in the blog Just Security explained the conflict between the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause and the president’s pardon powers. “Most likely [President Trump] has been informed of one important fact about his pardon power, anyone he pardons is no longer under criminal jeopardy for federal crimes and, accordingly, Fifth Amendment protection for self-incrimination evaporates,” Harper said.
>This precedent dates back to 1896 and the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Walker. In his majority opinion, Justice Henry Billings Brown found that if a “witness has already received a pardon, he cannot longer set up his [Fifth Amendment] privilege, since he stands, with respect to such offense, as if it had never been committed.” Brown cited cases dating back to English law and the Aaron Burr treason trial as supporting that conclusion.
Anon, you don't know this but if she takes the pardon than she can't invoke her 5th ammendment rights in court on the matter.
>The president has pardon or clemency power under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, of the Constitution, under the Pardon Clause. The clause says the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.” While the president’s powers to pardon seem unlimited, a presidential pardon can only be issued for a federal crime, and pardons can’t be issued for impeachment cases tried and convicted by Congress.
>In 2017, retired ambassador Keith Harper in the blog Just Security explained the conflict between the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause and the president’s pardon powers. “Most likely [President Trump] has been informed of one important fact about his pardon power, anyone he pardons is no longer under criminal jeopardy for federal crimes and, accordingly, Fifth Amendment protection for self-incrimination evaporates,” Harper said.
>This precedent dates back to 1896 and the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Walker. In his majority opinion, Justice Henry Billings Brown found that if a “witness has already received a pardon, he cannot longer set up his [Fifth Amendment] privilege, since he stands, with respect to such offense, as if it had never been committed.” Brown cited cases dating back to English law and the Aaron Burr treason trial as supporting that conclusion.
7/18/2025, 6:46:44 PM
>Ecelebs officially off the trump train because of him being a pedo
Here's how you really sound...
>hey /ptg/ look at what this e-grifter is saying
>I'm an expert on e-grifters because I dono to nick nightly before I'm allowed to cum.
>you should listen to these e-grifters /ptg/ because I like them a lot and I want to feel validated by knowing you like these e-grifters too!
No thanks, we are way better at geo-political analysis than anyone you spam on here. There is a reason why we won three elections and you all lost BIGLY!
>Bu... But.. But...But where will /ptg/ be without their beloved e-grifting-e-political-influencers?
Is that a real question? lmao
Here's how you really sound...
>hey /ptg/ look at what this e-grifter is saying
>I'm an expert on e-grifters because I dono to nick nightly before I'm allowed to cum.
>you should listen to these e-grifters /ptg/ because I like them a lot and I want to feel validated by knowing you like these e-grifters too!
No thanks, we are way better at geo-political analysis than anyone you spam on here. There is a reason why we won three elections and you all lost BIGLY!
>Bu... But.. But...But where will /ptg/ be without their beloved e-grifting-e-political-influencers?
Is that a real question? lmao
7/15/2025, 5:05:19 PM
>Where are the files and client list?
With law enforcement officials.
I'm glad I could help!
Also, AWOO!
With law enforcement officials.
I'm glad I could help!
Also, AWOO!
7/14/2025, 3:18:39 AM
7/12/2025, 3:09:00 AM
>>510140857
yeah, I've been watching them at times throughout the day get very salty: https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/
yeah, I've been watching them at times throughout the day get very salty: https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/
7/11/2025, 11:12:59 PM
7/9/2025, 12:15:55 AM
>>509869369
You should look at the Franklin Scandal all the way back in the 80's
You should look at the Franklin Scandal all the way back in the 80's
7/2/2025, 6:10:55 AM
>>509279186
I'm feeling too high to really care AWOO!
any new 90's animu AI? Are you browning out the state of california with all your AI prompting yet?
I'm feeling too high to really care AWOO!
any new 90's animu AI? Are you browning out the state of california with all your AI prompting yet?
6/26/2025, 12:28:39 AM
>>508731846
AWOO!
AWOO!
6/24/2025, 10:03:42 PM
>>508616620
In their undermining of Trump and the DoD, the media are giving israel an excuse to ask to bomb iran in another few years when Trump is out.
In their undermining of Trump and the DoD, the media are giving israel an excuse to ask to bomb iran in another few years when Trump is out.
6/24/2025, 8:43:15 PM
>>508608228
>You could've ended the sentence right there
true
I'm just enjoying the habbenings without having to think much on my day off AWOO.
>>508608171
AWOO!
>You could've ended the sentence right there
true
I'm just enjoying the habbenings without having to think much on my day off AWOO.
>>508608171
AWOO!
Page 1