Search Results
8/5/2025, 10:59:27 AM
>>213395323
It was, but they inadvertently created a film with a voice, one that overshot completely what was intended, which is exactly as you said, a holocaust allegory / plight of the Jew film. More subversive Abrahamic slop intended to gin-up sympathy for the tiny hat tribe that blew up in their face.
It spoke the name of the real victims and the real oppressors both, but only in the negative and only by accident. The second film was inevitable. The truth could NOT be allowed to stand.
So choice. Just so, so choice. “Chefs kiss” hilarious.
It was, but they inadvertently created a film with a voice, one that overshot completely what was intended, which is exactly as you said, a holocaust allegory / plight of the Jew film. More subversive Abrahamic slop intended to gin-up sympathy for the tiny hat tribe that blew up in their face.
It spoke the name of the real victims and the real oppressors both, but only in the negative and only by accident. The second film was inevitable. The truth could NOT be allowed to stand.
So choice. Just so, so choice. “Chefs kiss” hilarious.
Page 1