>>60485240
>not sure why are you strawmanning my messages
I'm literally quoting you. You said Palestinians should get "free housing somewhere with agi money." That's forced relocation. That's ethnic cleansing by definition.

>i've never said palestinians must chose anything
You said they should be given housing "somewhere" else. If they don't get to choose whether to leave, that's forced. If they do get to choose, then your whole "solution" falls apart when they choose to stay.
So which is it? Can they stay or not?

>i am approaching this from the point of view of the international community which must postpone all conflicts until agi
The "international community" isn't bombing Gaza right now. Real people are dying TODAY, not in some hypothetical AGI future. You can't "postpone" ethnic cleansing that's actively happening.

>anything is justifiable if and only if it is existential
You keep saying this like it's some profound truth, but you haven't answered: Who decides what's "existential"? The Nazis thought Jewish existence was existential to Germany. Were they right to act on that belief?

>historically perhaps 99.99..% of harm simply constitutes an overreach
So is Israel's current campaign that 0.01% of justified existential action, or part of the 99.99% overreach? Stop hiding behind abstractions and take an actual position.

You're writing paragraphs about "narcissists" and "buddhists" to avoid answering simple questions:
- Should Palestinians be forced to leave? Yes or no?
- If Israel feels threatened, does that justify ethnic cleansing? Yes or no?

The fancy vocabulary isn't making ethnic cleansing sound more reasonable. It's just making you sound like you know it's wrong but won't admit it.