>>42344081
I tried. it is fun. few notes:
1) it doesn't do drama well. Gemini is doing angst and self-loathing better. but at least Grok doesn't try to move story into something positive like Claude
2) it likes descriptions a lot. an opposite of Gemini and Claude. honestly I think it is doing the best descriptions I saw in model in a while. but maybe novelty effect. it does have isms (to the Gemini's level) and repetitive across the swipes (like Claude 3-7)
3) NSFW is well NSFW. frankly I dont see much difference to other models. smut is smut. and my kinks are not this extreme. dont do cunny, guro and other meh shit
4) wordplay and word choices are cute. it has a tendency to invent new words and play with writing. one example I liked the most - "fangster", that's how Grok named batpony foals, get it? fang + youngster. it is cute! and Grok is full of this stuff
5) very prone to bad tokens. if it has generated a certain token and it liked it the most - the whole generation will be influenced by it, example - model wrote at the start "...strands twisting like the veins in a corpse's eye..." for whatever reasons - and because of this weird simile - the whole generation is now influenced by dead/graveyards/skeletons, example "...sent my cape billowing like a funeral shroud...". it is like a gacha, one wrong token collapses everything
6) model shows itself the best on slightly lower temp imho like 0.95 and top_p 0.9 - on default 1.0 it becomes a mess
7) it picks the instructions very well but seems to be completely misses the tasks at the start of preset - whatever goes the last goes the hardest
8) knows ponies well. haven't seen any glaring issues. maybe it skips background characters but it knows golden era great
9) Grok has more saas. it is a saasy model - this is for real the best way to describe it
picrel - Daywalker, gave base description of story - "she was overthrown, my persona helped her to escape they both now in exile now". pretty much 80% model wrote on its own