>>509287917
What you are noticing is the difference on the type of beauty between man and woman.
Man's beauty is not in his appearance but in the art and mastery of what his hands can craft, even if he has a beer belly, whisky breath, curses alot and shows his hairy asscrack when working. His beauty is in the intricacy of the gears in a watch he assembled, the calculating of equations to make a rocket or a bridge function, the care decorating the toy he made for his children, the pain in his arm from hammering the hot iron into a sword, and of course the easiest way to see this is in architecture and the greatest of all buildings - civilization itself.
Woman's beauty on the other hand is apparent but shallow - the shape of her face, of her tits, of her ass. But even the beauty written on the shape of her body does not belong to her - she had no merit in it, she did not suffer for it. "Her beauty" is only a function of pleasing the male eye and instinct and was shaped by this only. So next time you are fucking a girl with a pretty face you should never be grateful *to her* for it. Be grateful to the 100 men - her ancestors - that shaped that face by their instinct when choosing to fuck and breed more X woman over Y woman. Woman is but a sculpture and it was man's instinct that chiseled her, and only for his own purpose - to create more men through her vessel.
Nowadays you have a very woman and appearance dominated society so people only think of this as "beauty". So Man is an *objectively* beautiful creature while woman is a *sexually* beautiful creature.